August 3, 2008
A deliberate attempt to confuse South Dakota voters
Bob, you beat me to it. (See his recent post at Dakota Voice) . During church this morning I got a text alerting me to the fact that the new South Dakota Campaign for UNHEalthy Families website just went up. I figured I'd take my Sunday afternoon nap before posting on what is obviously a deliberate attempt to confuse South Dakota voters. But again, Bob beat me to the point. Not that it's a race. What it does illustrate is that we are seeing this the same on both sides of our state.
The color schemes couldn't be more close for two groups that couldn't be more different. Since the UNHealthy Families people don't have "right" on their side, sowing confusion is necessary to win. High-paid out of state consultants are behind all of this - right down to the deceptive colors.
I think UNHealthy families should have chosen Halloween colors because they promote darkness and death. They literally bludgeon the most innocent to death and laugh in the face of those who point out the victims feel pain. Hell is on their side. They turn dumpsters into graveyards and abuse women. They are the friends of sex offenders (aborting the evidence, letting the perpetrator go out and do it again to another woman, or teenage girl). Halloween colors are more fitting because this campaign promotes child sacrifice (child sacrifice is merely the offering up one child in hopes of a better life for the others in the family). The ancient demonic spirit (Molech) operating in the campaign feeds on innocent shed blood.
Let me clear up the confusion a bit - if the folks at UNHealthy Families (mostly out-of-staters mind you) were honest, their ads would look like this.
Is the choice clear now? At least they could have picked pictures that more accurately depict what they are promoting. I suggest these…
Comments on A deliberate attempt to confuse South Dakota voters »
Bob Ellis @ 9:38 pm
You usually beat me, because you're closer to the Gates of Hell over there in Sioux Falls (no offense intended). A little Brotherly competition doesn't hurt, as long as we remember we're working for the same Master.
Keep the truth coming, Pastor!
Amy @ 12:51 pm
Steve:
When the little B family and I went over there to pray we noticed how they were using the same colors as Vote Yes - only it was a really tacky hand-painted sign on their window at the time (open house day).
We must continue to cut off their provisions in prayer and remove the veil of deception on a daily basis. We win.
Angry Guy @ 8:50 am
Maybe you should read ALL of the words on a website before you reproduce portions of it to terrorize your flock.
"Reproduction of this material without written permission is strictly forbidden."
Idiots.
Angry Guy @ 6:58 am
I guess my voice didn't carry as well as I thought.
I left a comment here yesterday pointing out the fact that you have blatantly reposted unauthorized material in your "blog". I may have also been harsh in my criticism by calling you an idiot. You would appear to be a little more evil than that. For some reason or other, you have chosen to delete my comment from your discussions. This makes me sad. There isn't any way that you can stop the killing of "babies" without an open forum. I am glad that I always printscreen everything I ever type in the blogosphere, so I can forward my deleted posts to the NCAC. We'll see if my voice still carries.
Let the misleading ensue » South DaCola @ 8:03 am
[…] Once again the Anti-choicers are spreading BS. Apparently they didn't learn anything from their lying last year. They claim SD Healthy Families stole Vote Yes' color scheme. Really. As I recall last year, SD healthy families site was similiar colors to what it is this year, and Vote Yes' was Pink and teal. Who is copying who? Remember when the Alpha Center bought the old PP building by the mall? Or when Lesless Unruh told everyone she had to hire a bodyguard last year (but didn't tell us it was to protect her from another pro-lifer, who was apparently crazier then her - didn't think it was possible. So remember folks, Condomns are bad and if you need to get checked for cervical cancer, call a chiropractor. « We don’t need an Event Center . . . yet. | […]
Angry Guy @ 9:55 am
ok… so it's back again.
Where did it go? Why is it back. Why do I care?
Steve @ 12:09 pm
Relax Angry Guy – I’m not deleting anything from you (yet). I did the UHaul thing for the last 36 hours getting my son off to college and don’t expect this to be a heavy blog week. I’d recommend you schedule an additional appointment with your therapist if you absolutely have to vent.
Other blogs may be, but I don’t really see this blog as an “open forum.” This blog aims to give voice to those without voice – the unborn. I have no time or interest to debate the anti-life crowd. Additionally an “open forum” means YOU come out in the open – anonymous angry people don’t get a serious “listen” from me. Planned Parenthood gave $100,000 to trumpet your message here in the state. I’m sure more has come since the last reporting was due and that this was just the first in several installments of big out of state bucks given to trumpet your message. This blog is not an additional platform for their propaganda.
Your cartoon friend “lifts” stuff all this time for satire purposes in his cartoon. Make sure you lean on him as well to make sure he gets written permission before poking fun at someone’s or something’s likeness.
» Note to Abortionists: South Dakota is a No Revision Zone SD Shovel @ 1:53 pm
[…] South DaCola blog claims today that a recent post at Voices Carry is "misleading" because it points out that the South Dakota Campaign for UnHealthy […]
Teresa @ 4:53 pm
Wow Angry guy-what's got you so angry? Are you afraid for people to see the TRUTH about what abortion really is? You and your pro-death camp are the ones who are spreading the BS! Apparently you didn't learn anything from your lying last time around. At least you didn't call yourself Angry MAN, because real men don't just stand by and let children be murdered!
Angry Guy @ 3:22 pm
Steve - South Dacola is thoughtful satire (OK… maybe not always thoughtful). Your depiction of SDCHF's website with your terrorist images superimposed is hardly satirical. I'm not trumpeting anyone's messages here or anywhere else. We are all free to form our own opinions. However, until I "miraculously" grow a uterus I don't have any right to tell a pregnant woman what to do with her unborn thingamajobber.
Note to Abortionists: South Dakota is a No Revision Zone @ 2:39 pm
[…] pro-abortionists and pro-abortion blogs.The South DaCola blog claims today that a recent post at Voices Carry is "misleading" because it points out that the South Dakota Campaign for UnHealthy […]