Pro-Voice? Deceptive Euphemism #1427

My running list of deceptive euphemisms from the purveyors of death lexicon is lengthening… Healthy Families, Abortion Care, Pro-Choicers, Anti-Choicers, or how's this… Abortion Provider. "Provide" implies you are offering something of value. There is no value offered women in abortion, they are exploited and that which is of immeasurable worth is actually destroyed by abortion.  But we can expect the euphamisms to continue as the industry continues to tend to it's crumbling respectability facade.

Here's a new one - Pro-Voice. You can read about that here. It comes through loud and clear how these radical feminists are still trying to figure out who they are. Here in South Dakota in 2006 the women hurt by abortion led the charge and, according to an LA Times article, that put the propaganda department at Planned Parenthood in a tail spin.

Talking about the psychological and physical harms of abortion, “adds an element we're not accustomed to” Planned Parenthood president and chief executive Sarah Stoesz told the Los Angeles Times. “It's a different line of debate. And that is something we struggle with politically.” (LA Times Oct. 9, 2006)

Please, please, please note that the LEADER of Planned Parenthood in this region is admitting she has no clue what abortion really does to women - they are "not accustomed to" hearing about the psychological and physical harms of abortion. No surprise really, her chop shop outfits offer none of the minimum standards of medical care and follow up afforded any other medical procedure. Her customers are told to pay up, shut up, sit back and then they are sent out the door. (Don't believe me, read the depositions given the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals in the South Dakota informed consent case.)

Incapable of anything original, the industry that destroys the creativity of others now wants to reframe the debate and recast itself as PRO-VOICE by letting women speak out about their abortion. 

Of course, only certain women get to speak.  Those hurt by abortion, at least 30%, certainly aren't welcome to tell their story. (Do you think the FDA would approve any other "fix" where 3 out of every 10 people who take it get hurt worse. Yet those who say they are for women's health care could care less.) Note here the cold and callous degard for women who played the Russian Roulette game called abortion and were unfortunate enough to get hurt;

And, of course, we have the growing problem of anti-choicers coaxing suffering women into blaming every problem they've had, from failed relationships to toe-stubbing, on previous abortions. 

So, "pro-voice" means it's okay for women to speak up as long as they parrot the talking points of the propaganda department at Planned Parenthood.

If you are wondering if the new "Pro-Voice" approach means the second patient involved in the abortion gets to speak up now.  Of course the answer is a big fat NO.  Those of you who have chosen to let the children in your home live know how kids always like to share with us the new things they can do.  Since the unborn don't have a voice, and since they don't get to speak in "Pro-Voice" circles, I'll give them voice here…

Everything that defines a person physically was present at fertilization - the only thing I needed to be big like you is more oxygen, nutrients and some time to develop. But I do have my very own genetic code. Even my blood type and gender at that point are discernably different from you mom.  My heart started beating at 18 days and my blood started pumping at 21 days!  At 40 days my brain started functioning!  I now have EEG trackings and a circulatory system. I'm responding to stimuli and I'm only six weeks old. Rapid Eye Movements (REM) charactoristic of actual dream states started for me at 23 weeks. Cool huh? Are you proud of me?