March 31, 2008
Obama would kill his grandchild for his daughters "mistake"

Babies are gifts from God. Unless you are the most liberal member of the US Senate, the one running for President who advocates killing even born-alive infants. In that case, some babies are mistakes and he wouldn't wish them on anyone, especially his two daughters.
…look, I've got two daughters. 9 years old and 6 years old. I am going to teach them first of all about values and morals. But if they make a mistake, I don't want them punished with a baby.
Not wanting to "punish" his daughters with a baby, here is the Obama solution to make the "mistake" go away…. punish the baby instead by dismembering it while its still alive. That's why the Bible calls this the shedding of "innocent" blood - the one being punished didn't do anything wrong. Actually the Obama solution is even more harsh… if the baby is born alive, he'd leave it to die.
I wonder what "values and morals" Obama plans to teach his daughters "first of all." Certainly not the value of the sacredness of human life. And certainly he isn't going to teach them anything in this antiquated paragraph: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Would you vote for a President who'd kill his own grandchild? Later he did say his two daughters were "miracles."
This is a very difficult issue, and I understand sort of the passions on both sides of the issue. I have two precious daughters - they are miracles.
So, let me get this straight… if we want a baby they are "miracles," if we don't they are "mistakes." Seems to me the only thing that is different between baby A and baby B is our wishes. I'm about to rest my case that babies are babies regardless of the circumstances that surround their conception and therefore need to be legally protected from the whims and wishes of people more concerned for their own welfare than the baby's.
Filed under Abortion - national debate by Steve




Comments on Obama would kill his grandchild for his daughters "mistake" »
horton Hears @ 5:02 pm
It amazes me how Sen. Obama publically announces he would be okay with his daughter having an abortion, if SHE made a mistake. Yet, he would punish the one who had not made the mistake, the unborn child.
What would have happened if his "typically white" grandma would have thought HE was a mistake?????? Would Sen. Obama even be alive today?????
Just some food for thought….
As Horton the Elephant so eloquently stated "A person's a person no matter how small".
Matt @ 10:07 am
When is a person a person? How do we legally define the difference between baby A and baby B? When are they entitled to those "certain unalienable rights"? Can anyone say "Human Life Amendment"?
Clifford @ 10:45 am
Statements like this tick me off in a way that is hard for me to express. Don't Obama supporters see the hypocrisy in this??? or is it that they flat out don't care, are they just as guilty? I would like to ask why is the media not outraged by this, but I think we all know the answer to that question. It is deeply saddening to me, and I pray that my heart would stay soft even as our society is growing harder. Jesus rescued me one yard from hell, I have to believe that he has mercy for my country as well.
Horton Hears @ 1:42 pm
It has been proven that life begins at conception. if you don't believe me, read what the experts say:
"There can no longer be any doubt that each human being is totally unique from the very beginning of his or her life at fertilization."
"A human being at an embryonic age and that human being at an adult age are naturally the same, the biological differences are due only to the differences in maturity."
by Dr. David Fu-Chi Mark, Dr. Mark is a nationally celebrated molecular biologist.
to read more:
http://www.voteyesforlife.com/docs/Task_Force_Report.pdf
Ben Keeler @ 2:08 pm
What a dumb comment. Even if that he really thinks, why would he say it.